Construction projects can improve the value of real property. People paying for renovations, new construction or the expansion of an existing property often have a clear vision in mind. In some cases, they even request specific materials, such as granite countertops.
Construction firms and contractors may sign a contract that includes the client’s specifications. The client may initially believe that the professional or business did an excellent job. However, they may later discover that the construction project involved a substantial material substitution. In such cases, a construction defect lawsuit might be possible.
Material substitutions can violate contracts
Many times, those seeking renovations or repairs request specific materials or clarify what they want for the finished product. If the professional replaces requested materials with a cheaper option, their actions could constitute a breach of contract. Substituting Formica countertops for stone could justify a lawsuit.
Construction litigation might also be possible in cases where professionals deviate from current industry standards. For example, it is standard practice to use drywall unless there have been agreements made with the client previously. Some companies may try to substitute cheaper materials, including plastic sheeting or paper-thin boards that crumble under pressure.
In such scenarios, the use of cheaper, substandard materials may undermine the usefulness of the space and the value of the project. The client may potentially have grounds to pursue a lawsuit in that scenario as well.
Reviewing an initial contract and details about the finished project can help homeowners evaluate whether they can file a construction defect lawsuit. Property owners can potentially recoup their losses or have the work on their property redone if they pursue litigation successfully.
